home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage
- From: vandevod@cs.rpi.edu (David Vandevoorde)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Template argument deduction
- Date: 19 Apr 1996 14:43:42 GMT
- Organization: RPI Computer Science
- Sender: vandevod@avs.cs.rpi.edu
- Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++)
- Message-ID: <xsok9zdkmuj.fsf@avs.cs.rpi.edu>
- References: <FREYBURG.96Apr15144107@glitch.stanford.edu>
- <xsoratnorr5.fsf@avs.cs.rpi.edu>
- <FREYBURG.96Apr18141053@wavelet.stanford.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: avs.cs.rpi.edu
- In-Reply-To: freyburg@wavelet.stanford.edu's message of 18 Apr 1996 21:14:46
- GMT
- X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1
- Content-Length: 773
- X-Lines: 19
- Originator: clamage@taumet
-
- >>>>> "BF" == Brian Michael Freyburger <freyburg@wavelet.stanford.edu> writes:
- I (Daveed) wrote:
- >> It's a non-issue since default template arguments cannot be
- >> specified for function templates.
-
- BF> Where in the working papers does it say this? They appear to me
- BF> to be introduced in 14.8 [temp.arg], which as far as I can tell
- BF> applies to both functions and classes. I see nothing in 14.10
- BF> [temp.fct] which disallows them--what did I miss?
-
- Good point ;^P It's not in the April '95 CD, apparently :^( However,
- it's in the Templates chapter as revised for the Santa Cruz meeting.
- Sorry for the confusion, I didn't realize this was this recent.
-
- BF> Why are they disallowed? Are there any technical difficults?
-
- The problem you mentioned maybe ;-)
-
- Daveed
-
-
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: try just posting with ]
- [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
- [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]
- [ Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
- [ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]
-